<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    <title>ingo() -&gt; tech. % Ingo Schramm - Comments</title>
    <link>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/</link>
    <description>ingo() -&gt; tech. % Ingo Schramm - Share experience in web development</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.3.1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:13:09 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>Matt: PHP Myth: static function call faster than instance function call</title>
    <link>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/4-PHP-Myth-static-function-call-faster-than-instance-function-call.html#c103</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/4-PHP-Myth-static-function-call-faster-than-instance-function-call.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=4</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Matt)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Thanks, this answered the question for me...it&#039;s the quantity of calls that proves if one is better suited for the situation than another. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:10:58 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/4-guid.html#c103</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Ingo: Wave - Real-Time Social Networking </title>
    <link>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/12-Wave-Real-Time-Social-Networking.html#c102</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/12-Wave-Real-Time-Social-Networking.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=12</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Ingo)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Transcendence is a Co-Dimension &lt;img src=&quot;http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/templates/default/img/emoticons/smile.png&quot; alt=&quot;:-)&quot; style=&quot;display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;&quot; class=&quot;emoticon&quot; /&gt; 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:41:13 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/12-guid.html#c102</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>crudy: Wave - Real-Time Social Networking </title>
    <link>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/12-Wave-Real-Time-Social-Networking.html#c101</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/12-Wave-Real-Time-Social-Networking.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=12</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (crudy)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &quot;So, if you ever think of integrating Wave into your social apps, you should be aware that in fact you do integrate your social graph into Google Wave.&quot; - Fair point! But that is thought on an abstract level - and people usually don&#039;t think like this (geeks not included). Most of the people think it&#039;s the application which has integrated wave that gives them a good user experience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, by the way: &quot;an application reflecting any dimension of the human mind - time, space and communication.&quot; - There&#039;s another dimension, beyond time, space and communication, and that&#039;s transcendence. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:09:58 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/12-guid.html#c101</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Mea: PHP Myth: static function call faster than instance function call</title>
    <link>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/4-PHP-Myth-static-function-call-faster-than-instance-function-call.html#c100</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/4-PHP-Myth-static-function-call-faster-than-instance-function-call.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=4</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Mea)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Thanks for this. It really helped me out! 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:39:22 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/4-guid.html#c100</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Connor: PHP Myth: static function call faster than instance function call</title>
    <link>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/4-PHP-Myth-static-function-call-faster-than-instance-function-call.html#c99</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/4-PHP-Myth-static-function-call-faster-than-instance-function-call.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=4</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Connor)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Very useful information 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:06:27 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/4-guid.html#c99</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Ingo Schramm: Erlang Release R13B Preview Benchmark</title>
    <link>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/10-Erlang-Release-R13B-Preview-Benchmark.html#c17</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/10-Erlang-Release-R13B-Preview-Benchmark.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=10</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Ingo Schramm)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    I added the sources &lt;img src=&quot;http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/templates/default/img/emoticons/smile.png&quot; alt=&quot;:-)&quot; style=&quot;display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;&quot; class=&quot;emoticon&quot; /&gt; 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:48:13 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/10-guid.html#c17</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Florian Ebeling: Erlang Release R13B Preview Benchmark</title>
    <link>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/10-Erlang-Release-R13B-Preview-Benchmark.html#c6</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/10-Erlang-Release-R13B-Preview-Benchmark.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=10</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Florian Ebeling)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    It would make the benchmark more valuable if you attached the source code you where running as well. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:27:11 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/10-guid.html#c6</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>